Blog

VPS London Benchmark: UpCloud Tops Memory and I/O

London data centers matter for European audiences. If you're serving users across the pond, milliseconds add up.

This month's VPS benchmark roundup tested five providers from a single London location. The results show clear winners depending on what you're optimizing for.

At a Glance

  • UpCloud led in memory, file I/O, and database benchmarks
  • Vultr dominated network upload and download speeds
  • Linode showed the strongest CPU performance
  • Lightsail offers the most storage and transfer allowance
  • All providers used identical 1 GB RAM, 1 core CPU specs

How the Providers Stack Up

All five services ran Ubuntu 18.04 LTS with matching specs: 1 GB RAM, one virtual CPU, and 25 GB SSD storage. Only Lightsail deviated, shipping 40 GB of storage and 2 TB of monthly transfer instead of the standard 25 GB and 1 TB.

The identical hardware baseline makes performance differences straightforward to interpret.

CPU and Compute Performance

Linode pulled ahead on raw compute, posting the highest events-per-second score in the CPU benchmark. DigitalOcean and Vultr trailed, with Vultr landing near the bottom of the pack. Lightsail sat comfortably in the middle.

For compute-heavy tasks, Linode's London offering looks promising.

Memory Operations

UpCloud dominated here with the highest read and write operations per second. DigitalOcean and Linode traded second place. Lightsail performed notably slower in this category.

If your application lives in memory, UpCloud is the choice.

File and Disk I/O

UpCloud's disk performance stood out dramatically. Its fsyncs-per-second score dwarfed the competition, with Linode in second place. The gap between UpCloud and the rest was substantial.

For I/O-heavy applications, this benchmark tells you everything you need to know.

Database Performance

UpCloud dominated MySQL testing, leading in both transactions per second and total queries per second. Linode claimed second place, while DigitalOcean and Vultr fell further behind. Lightsail's database performance lagged behind the field.

UpCloud's infrastructure clearly handles database workloads well.

Network Speed Tests

Vultr posted the fastest download and upload speeds in the test. UpCloud's download speed was slower but still competitive. Lightsail's download speeds came in at the lower end of the results.

If your project moves a lot of data over the network, Vultr has the edge.

Our Analysis

The benchmark reveals distinct specializations. UpCloud excels at I/O-bound workloads that typical web applications depend on. Vultr wins on raw network throughput. Linode offers strong compute performance for tasks that tax the processor.

What matters most to you? If you run databases or content management systems, UpCloud's I/O leadership translates directly to snappier user experiences. If you serve large files or media, Vultr's network speed advantage saves time.

The pricing picture would sharpen these choices. At similar price points, UpCloud's performance advantage is compelling.

A Concrete Example

Say you're running a small e-commerce store on a budget VPS. Your database handles product queries, your disk serves images, and your users spread across Europe. UpCloud would likely outperform the alternatives across all three fronts. The speed difference matters for conversion rates—every extra second of load time costs you sales.

What to Watch Next

The next round of benchmarks will include NoSQL databases like MongoDB and Redis. For Android developers running backend services or caching layers, those results will be more directly relevant than general Linux performance numbers.

Key takeaways

  • UpCloud leads in memory, disk I/O, and database operations from London
  • Vultr dominates network throughput for bandwidth-heavy applications
  • Linode excels at CPU-intensive compute tasks
  • Lightsail remains the choice when storage and transfer volume matter more than speed

Frequently asked questions

Why does London location matter for VPS benchmarking?

Testing from a single geographic point removes variables. All providers ran their London instances from actual London data centers, giving a fair comparison for European deployments.

How do I choose between these VPS providers?

Match your workload to the winner. Database-heavy applications benefit most from UpCloud. Bandwidth-intensive projects favor Vultr. General-purpose web hosting performs fine on any of them.

Did DigitalOcean or Vultr perform poorly?

Neither did poorly overall. They simply didn't lead any category this round. Both remain solid choices for specific use cases like general web hosting or applications prioritizing network speed.

What about Lightsail's higher storage and transfer?

Those advantages are real. If you need storage space or monthly bandwidth allowance, Lightsail offers more for similar money. You trade raw performance for capacity.

Will there be more benchmark rounds?

Yes. The author plans to add NoSQL benchmarks and potentially expand testing to more European data center locations.

Related